Rollin' Eyeballs
The eye cannot say to the hand, "I don't need you!" And the head cannot say to the feet, "I don't need you!" On the contrary, those parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable, and the parts that we think are less honorable we treat with special honor. And the parts that are unpresentable are treated with special modesty, while our presentable parts need no special treatment. But God has combined the members of the body and has given greater honor to the parts that lacked it, so that there should be no division in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each other. If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it. 1 Corinthians 12:14-26
Every person that walks into church is a different part of the body of Christ. Some of us are eyes, some are hands, some are the head, some are the feet.
What happens if these body parts never work together as one body? What happens if the people never come together in relationships to support one another and move forward together?
It's like a single eyeball that rolls into church, watches the Sunday service, and then the eyeball rolls out of church again without ever touching another body part. It's like an ear that comes just to listen to the sermon, or lips that only showed up so they could sing, and then each part leaves on its own again.
Sure, each body part and each person might get something from the Sunday service but the experience is so limited. We need those other parts and those other people to really grow and to really accomplish something meaningful.
5 comments:
aka Mie
You know, both you and your dad would benefit greatly from reading some anarcho/marxist theory. Super smart people have been thinking about how to build this kind of collectivity for quite some time now, and there's no need to re-invent the wheel.
One suggestion: part of the old marxist logic was "All people support the party." This wasn't some empirical statement that could be disproven by pointing out that, in fact, a substantial number of people did not support the party. Rather, the statement defined the people. If you did not support the party, than you were not a part of "the people" as such.
Translate that into church life. "All church members are actively engaged."
Mike. That was Mike. I have no idea who this Mie person is, but they're probably a douche.
"All church members are actively engaged." Interesting parallel there...
I prefer to phrase this as, "Christians need close friendships."
But you're not trying to build a community on friendships between people, you're trying to build in on a third term - God.
Mike
I don't see anything wrong with being an eyeball, I'm quite happy being one actually ; )
Post a Comment